I knew, just as soon as I read it, that I wanted to write something on the topic. But the more I thought about it the less sure I was about what I wanted to write. I mean, I know that sex is pretty damn important to me. I consider good sex a dealbreaker. If the sex is no good then there’s no point in moving forward with a relationship (and this is not something I take lightly, just look at what happened with The Musician – I liked the guy but there was just no way).
But knowing that good sex is important to me is different than believing that it’s a basic human need. It’s now been months since I’ve had good sex. And, to be perfectly blunt, it’s been almost a year since I’ve had mind-blowing great sex. Things with Mr. Potential were good, but they were never GREAT. Anyway, my point is that I’m fine. I could be better but I’m fine.
So, do I need good sex? No, I don’t think so. I want it. Absofuckinlutely. But I don’t need it. And so I guess I don’t think it’s a basic human need. Not when compared with real essentials like food, water and shelter.
What about you – what do you think? Is good sex a basic human need?
- Yes. Good sex is a basic human need. (137 votes)
- No. Good sex is not a basic human need. (63 votes)
- SG – you really need to stop asking these lame questions. (19 votes)
Tags: dealbreaker, good sex, needs, sex, wants